-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> selinux-policy-targeted is a memory hog, but it should not have changed >> that drastically in updates. >> >> Is this repeatable? > > 100% repeatable on the 3 attempts on the lower-mem machine. On the same machin > > The package selinux-policy-targeted 3.3.1 103.fc9 -- I am running a > couple of additional installs to gather more information. > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Chris Lumens <clumens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> - Anaconda OOMs without a warning or useful message to the user >> I don't believe there's any way for anaconda to know this, and there's >> certainly no way for us to do anything about it. > > Well, the behaviour is really weird. Perhaps there is no OOM killer in > place during an anaconda install? If there was, it'd expect the rpm > process or anaconda to be shot down -- but the machine is halting > instead, it literally switches off. > > Whatever is bootstrapping anaconda (init script in the initrd?) should > be able to at least see the odd exit status and echo a "something went > wrong" msg...? Maybe that's the problem? > > cheers, > > > > m Well selinux-policy-targeted is not supported on olpc so you should probably exclude it from the install. I can not imagine what in updates caused it to grow. Upgrades add rules but usually not a large amount. Going from Fedora 9 to 10 could be a problem. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkkUYkQACgkQrlYvE4MpobP7iwCeMpfEbsKEmvbp1oaAM5U9akG+ l8IAoIOlHoMsPXo6T36A/UWER0mtLMIS =3pHW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
