Re: How to get an SELinux policy change

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jerry James wrote:
I'm working on getting GCL to run again.  The current Debian patch
(which is enormous) fixes most problems, but not the long-running
SELinux problem that GCL has had.  I took a hint from a thread on this
list a couple of months ago.  I let make run until it crashed due to a
denied mprotect() call, did chcon -t java_exec_t on the binaries, and
restarted the make.  It completed successfully.  I can patch the
makefile to do the chcon call in the right place, but I'm worried
about getting the right security context on installation now.  First,
is using java_exec_t in this way acceptable?  Second, if so, how do I
ask for Fedora's policy to reflect that: bugzilla, request on this
list, some other list?  Thanks,

Just file a bugzilla against selinux-policy. Dan Walsh (the maintainer) is usually very fast and correct in fixing issues like this one.

Regards,

Hans

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux