On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 7:05 AM, Bryn M. Reeves <bmr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > OT but.. That snippet *is* legal C, but the validity of compiling this file > then depends on the content of unistd.h (which if it's a "real" unistd.h > will of course never produce legal preprocessed C...). When I filed a bug about this, Jakub Jelinek replied: Then GCL is buggy. Standard headers are never meant to be included inside of a function. E.g. ISO C99 says in 7.1.2/4: ... "If used, a header shall be included outside of any external declaration or definition, and it shall first be included before the first reference to any of the functions or objects it declares, or to any of the types or macros it defines."... Regards, -- Jerry James http://loganjerry.googlepages.com/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
