Re: Detecting binaries in rpmbuild

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:53:33AM +0100, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> Op maandag 03-11-2008 om 13:55 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Orion
> Poplawski:
> > I just discovered in a package I'm putting through review that the 
> > upstream tar ball contains some pre-compiled binaries.  It seems like 
> > this would be a good check for rpmbuild to run automatically before
> > the 
> > %build step.  Thoughts? 
> 
> That would kill some packages. Like all compilers that have to bootstrap
> theirselves. 

Should compilers be carrying binary stuff in their source tarballs
even for bootstrapping?

For MinGW we separated the binary bootstrap stuff into separate
*NON-Fedora* RPMs.  The idea is that if you need to bootstrap on a
bare system, you have to install these *-bootstrap RPMs, and then you
can compile the real RPMs (from pure source SRPMS of course), and once
these are installed they obsolete the *-bootstrap RPMs.  Thus our
Fedora SRPMs are pure source, no binaries.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Bootstrapping

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines.  Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen guests.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux