Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Saturday, 01 November 2008 at 08:27, Kushal Das wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Tim Lauridsen >> <tim.lauridsen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >>> I the ideal tool for this purpose IHO, would be some kind of web >>> application, to handle all the workflow around getting packages into Fedora. >>> * uploading specs and srpms >>> * do automatic tests based on packaging guidelines. >>> * a reviewer multiple choice popquiz to go through all the checks in review >>> guidelines. showing the result of the automatic test for the each rules. >> This is going to be a web application only. Current code is for PoC. > > Bleh. What about offline checking? Or at least, will this web application > work with lynx/links? > Also, do we trust mock with unaudited spec files? I know that we do trust it with unaudited tarballs but I don't know if this is a reason to open things up further. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
