Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 05:21:55PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: >> Really we need a post-build (BRP) hook in RPM to nuke them instead of >> copy&paste of rm into spec files. > > We need the *.la files for MinGW packages. > Is that a "We need the *.la files for MinGW packages" or "We need the *.la files in MinGW packages"? I think it's the latter but want to make sure. Also, as Patrice erroneously points out, some packages will break without the *.la files. I have yet to see a package where that's actually a "needs" case. However, I have seen places where the upstream code looks for the *.la file when libltdl (the libtool library) is willing to look for either the *.so or the *.la. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
