Re: WPA without NetworkManager (was: Re: X on tty1 in Rawhide/F10)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, 30 October 2008 at 14:47, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski (dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > > Possibly because that particular patch wasn't ever in bugzilla (AFAICT.)
> > 
> > It was, although it contained reindentation cosmetics. I only cleaned it up.
> 
> Not in either of the open bugs about wpa & initscripts. Perhaps it's
> hiding somewhere else. (The ones in the open bugs were 'start WPA
> supplicant and magically hope it associates in time'.)

I'll try to find it.

> > > It's certainly a better one, but there's still the problem of entirely
> > > disparate configuration (manually editing wpa_supplicant.conf, etc.)
> > 
> > What's wrong with manually editing wpa_supplicant.conf?
> 
> For WEP, you put keys <in one place>. For WPA you put keys and networks <this
> entirely separate place and format>. It's a hack.

You can use wpa_supplicant for WEP, too.

Regards,
R.

-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
        -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux