Re: Fedora 11: moving to posix file capabilities?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 14:44 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 20:41 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, seth vidal wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 20:25 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > >> error: Failed dependencies:
> > >>  	rpmlib(FileCaps) <= 4.6.1-1 is needed by ...
> > >
> > > Except nothing really watches those rpmlib() deps much at all, does it?
> > 
> > Rpm itself does, so unless you use --nodeps (or the API equivalent of 
> > that) it'll get caught before transaction starts.
> 
> but after you've downloaded everything. And what provides those things
> these days?

They're internally provided by rpm as they always have been.  And the
only place they can reasonably be checked is within rpmlib as is done
now.  Yeah, it means you download things and then get told "too bad!"
but there's really not a good way around that unless we were to
replicate all of the checks in yum

Jeremy

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux