On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 08:13:54PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > And while this was just a naming change.. it was a big deal to the > cultures involved. Technical changes on the other hand have a bigger It *was* a big deal, because at that point, Red Hat had built up a solid tradition of making really questionable .0 releases, decent .1 releases, and great .2 releases. Hmmm. If we consider 7.3 to _really_ be 8.0, 8 to really be 8.1, and 9 to be 8.2, this held true for that series too. Maybe even for FC1, FC2, and FC3. :) -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> Senior Systems Architect Cyberinfrastructure Labs Computing & Information Technology Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
