On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:42:23 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > I would argue strongly that this change should not be made for the > > following reasons (in no particular order): > > > I'm sure we'll be inundated with 'fedora is all about the bleeding > edge' comments but I have to give Dax my support with this comment. > He's not saying "preserve compatibility/behavior at all costs". He's > saying that the stated reason for this behavior change is not enough > to justify the cost of the loss of consistency with the past. > > In short: +1 I think one flicker doesn't weigh much in contrast of what gets lost in terms of historical background and compatibility... +1 from me too Cheers, Christian -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
