> As far as I can see, anjuta has not yet been rebuilt: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1302 > > and still causing broken deps in rawhide... :-( > > Does this require a new upstream version? It's really not a good idea > to bump soname, and then leave the dependent packages to be broken for > about 5 days. Either rebuild the dependent packags immediately after > pushing the soname, or wait until you have time to do them all at > once. Since there are multiple packages contributing to broken dependencies in Rawhide, and some of them don't get fixed for weeks (ruby-rpm comes to my mind), I can not agree with the above rationale. The reason Anjuta 2.23.x were not built and we directly jumped to Anjuta 2.24 has been mentioned on the Trac ticket [1]. At this point in the development cycle I wanted to be sure about Anjuta 2.24's functionality before pushing it. 2.24.1 is already a bug fix release, but if Rawhide users can unearth some more problems, I will gladly take them up. Happy hacking, Debarshi [1] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/888 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
