Re: libgdl soname breakage?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "MB" == Mat Booth  writes:

[...]


>> Removing libgdl-gnome-1.so seems to be a rather drastic step,
>> especially if these apps need it and it isn't provided by any other
>> package.  Is this just a packaging error?  I note that Debarshi Ray
>> who rebuilt libgdl is also the maintainer of 2 of the 3 broken
>> packages: anjuta and gnome-build, so I assume that he'll hopefully
>> have plan to fix this breakage. ;)
>> 
>> Otherwise this change should probably be reverted.
>> 
>> Again, please announce any ABI changes on f-d-l in advance.

>> Alex


MB> Yeah, Debarshi says he'll take care of Anjuta and gnome-build.

MB> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-October/msg02330.html

I read f-d-l via gmane and somehow the feed was lagging so I didn't
see this message from Debarshi.  Apologies.

Nevetheless it appears that more than gnome-build and anjuta are
affected, so is gnome-python2.

Alex

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux