On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 09:22 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:16 AM, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > No, I meant if you added an explicit require for an item that the > > package provides. Stop that. > > Two of my packages appear in the list. One is mona. It provides a > handful of libraries, which have dependencies between them; i.e., > library 1 is linked to library 2 which is linked to library 3, etc. > So every library but the top-level one appears in the automatically > generated Requires. The other is check. I have no idea what is going > on there. If anyone has a clue, clue me in, please. > > Isn't part of the problem that /usr/lib/rpm/find-requires doesn't > filter out the files it examines from its result set? That seems to > be what is happening with mona. Yes! And that's what I was suggesting be fixed. I was also asking packagers to make sure they are not accidentally setting an explicit require that they don't actually need. that's all. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
