On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 09:18 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > So I'm going to do this tomorrow or have to put it off until after > change freeze. > > The name I personally favour is masterpackager since it evokes the > apprentice, journeyman, master craftsman stages that seem most like what > we're modeling here. > > I know this isn't as flamboyant as ultrapackager, superpackager, etc but > can everyone live with this? No, I'm offended by the idea that a common root used in many geek words can so easily be declared 'unclean' and eradicated. This is political correctness at its worst, and I find it horrifically offensive. And that's a _current_ issue, not one from the previous millennium. I have no particular attachment to the 'überpackager' name, but I object strongly to the change on _principle_. Please leave it as it was. -- dwmw2 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
