On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Richard Hughes <hughsient@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Upstream the PackageKit-Qt library binding has been merged into the > PackageKit scm and will be in the next release tarball. This allows us > to keep the libraries in sync and also means QPackageKit gets a lot of > the love that PackageKit gets. > > Love includes things like a .pc file, consistent so versioning, make > check integration and also much better integration with upstream. > > Now we have two libraries (soon to be three), I'm intending to rename: > > PackageKit-libs -> PackageKit-libs-glib why not just PackageKit-glib ? like NetworkManager-glib, dbus-glib, avahi-glib etc. > PackageKit-devel -> PackageKit-glib-devel > > This allows us to create PackageKit-libs-qt and PackageKit-qt-devel and > then provide this for other QT and KDE applications to trivially build > against. same here I would just drop the libs and call it PackageKit-qt -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
