On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:27:35AM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > It would be great if some effort could also be spent extending rpmlint > itself to handle most of these things. Why implement a new tool when > we have one already? > > Furthermore, since the Packaging Guidelines can change, it would help > if they were versioned in some way so that rpmlint could refer to > which version of the guidelines it is following. Unless I am wrong, rpmlint is not a checked for fedora package guidelines, it is distribution agnostic, simply a tool for checking common errors in rpm packages. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
