Re: reviving Fedora Legacy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed October 15 2008, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Till Maas wrote:
> > On Wed October 15 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> (And bug reports, blah blah blah.)
> >
> > If the ACLs for the EOL releases are cleared, the maintainers of the
> > supported packages will not get any bug reports (unless Bugzilla does not
> > support this of course). Also the EOL-team can triage the bugs for the
> > supported release to avoid bugging the maintainers.
>
> I think we're stretching beyond bugzilla's capabilities but I'd be happy
> to be proved wrong :-)
>
> I don't think bugzilla has separation of Product-versions so there's no
> way to assign different people to Fedora-10 and Fedora-7.

I always feared this. In case this is true and initialCC cannot be configured 
differently for different Fedora versions, too, (which I assume is 
unrealistic if bugzilla cannot distinguish versions for assignees) imho the 
packageDB UI should reflect this.

Regards,
Till

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux