On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 09:14:42PM +0000, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > The expectations people will undoubtedly have from this sort of extended > release maintenance will be completely out of line with what's provided. > How can you provide security updates for some of a distribution and have > it be meaningful? What does it matter if you patch a problem in a user > application and not those in the kernel? And how do you reconcile that > disparity with the expectations of the user of this supposedly > maintained branch, who thinks that somehow they're doing better > security-wise than if they move to a platform actively maintained by a > community, be it a current Fedora, RHEL, or CentOS? I cannot do anything if people don't read the pages explaining what the project offers. Did I said something about 'doing better security-wise than if they move to a platform actively maintained by a community, be it a current Fedora, RHEL, or CentOS'. No. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
