On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 09:33 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > I occasionally bring up the SELinux issue because I'm trying to ask > "what would a regular computer user think?", not whether I can solve the > problem for myself with setting contexts or disabling the protection. > > And last night, I had a wonderful SELinux experience again, this time > using Samba shares. None of the guests running within KVM were able to > talk to Samba, so I wasted time pondering networking problems, etc. > before I realized I rebooted since I setup the Samba shares. In the end, > the usual process of mumbling sweet words about SELinux and turning it > off was the response...and I remain convinced therefore that it is > entirely appropriate to subject regular desktop users to SELinux. Sorry, should that be s/appropriate/inappropriate/? Just trying to understand what you're saying. Jonathan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
