Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
Jon Stanley пишет:
> Well, in all fairness, Fedora's stated goal is to advance the state of
free software. You get that by being bleeding-edge. Unfortunately,
being bleeding edge also means not being suitable for production
environments - these are two fundamentally incompatible goals. This is
why Red Hat Linux split into two - Fedora and RHEL. RHEL is a
derivative distribution of Fedora.
All sounds good, by RHEL is not free. So, in this case many people
It may not be free but id Free.
pointed to CentOS, and I agree with it, but it is even not RedHat or
Fedora initiative.
Does it matter who's the initiative from? if the bits, the license and
the price are right...
--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
