Rahul Sundaram пишет:
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
Matej Cepl пишет:
On 2008-10-10, 13:13 GMT, Mark Bidewell wrote:
I would submit that CentOS/RHEL IS the equivalent of
Fedora LTS.
I would venture even to say that CentOS *is* Fedora LTS
I agree what CentOS is more stable and has more time support, but it
is totally not equivalent of Fedora. Just see CVS branches of programs
for Fedora and RHEL. So, many (notably new and not highly famous)
programs is not present in RHEL and CentOS.
About 2000 more in EPEL. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL.
Participate, if you would like to see your (missing) favourites as well.
Rahul
Off course. This is not reproach. I'm only constant fact - CentOS is far
from "Fedora LTS" equivalent. So, I'm choose Fedora and participate in
it. And, with think what Fedora no needed LTS, any similar it is highly
needed for servers, I thought sometimes.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
