On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 06:41:59PM -0700, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > We're pondering splitting the ghc (Glasgow Haskell Compiler) package > into two: bsae ghc (retaining the ghc name) and ghc-platform (standard > libraries). The need for this is driven by the fact that ghc and its > standard libraries are going to be developed separately, and released > on different cycles. (The "ghc-" prefix for the platform package > merely denotes that it's Haskell code built to work with GHC.) > > Given this, is there any reason to put the new ghc-platform package > through the normal package review process, or would there be some way > to fast-track it? I think that a new review is required, but I would suggest that you put in CC the person who approved the ghc package such that this goes fast. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
