Re: Dead or alive package [Fwd: [Bug 465111] New: FTBFS bluez-utils-3.36-2.fc10]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 08 October 2008 23:17:32 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jarod Wilson <jarod <at> redhat.com> writes:
> > I thought it was marked dead.package, because bluez-utils was obsoleted
> > by bluez or something like that, not because of the FTBFS bug.
>
> Sure, but it's kinda pointless to fix bugs in an obsolete package. ;-)

I had the impression Bastien was asking if the package had been marked dead 
because of the FTBFS bug. I probably mis-parsed something though.

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jarod@xxxxxxxxxx

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux