Karsten Hopp wrote: > Getting libtool-2.2 into F-11 is my plan, but I most likely need to get > that through > FESCo as it breaks up to 300 packages according to my mass rebuilds. I'm > going to > prepare a Wiki page with details about that. > It doesn't need FESCo approval. It does need discussion, wide publication, and possibly an offer to help packagers who are affected by the change. A wiki page is definitely a good place to start. If you feel the change is too disruptive to land in the main repo until some things have been fixed (even in the earliest period of the F-11 rawhide cycle) you can coordinate with rel-eng to have a separate build tag where you work on fixing the packages that break before turning it loose on the masses. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
