On Wednesday 08 October 2008, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 20:16 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > I think the Obsoletes alone accomplishes auto-upgrading from codeina to > > pk-gstreamer-plugin. I hope that's what you meant as desirable in the > > above, I'm having a bit of a problem parsing it. > > With an obsolete alone, 'yum update' would never see that it needs to > bring in pk-gstreamer-plugin. Codeina would be left alone. That's not how any depsolver I'm aware of behaves - I think it'd be a bug. > IMHO that's > not the scenario we want played out. We /want/ Codeina replaced by the > packagekit solution, and the only way to make that happen for people > already with codeina installed is to add the Provides. As said, the Obsoletes should be enough for that. And is for me (on F-9): ---- # rpm -q codeina codeina-0.10.1-8.fc9.noarch # cat <<EOF > /etc/yum.repos.d/tmp2.repo [tmp2] name=tmp2 gpgcheck=0 baseurl=http://scop.fedorapeople.org/tmp2/ EOF # repoquery --provides pk-gstreamer-plugin-fake pk-gstreamer-plugin-fake = 1.0-1 # repoquery --obsoletes pk-gstreamer-plugin-fake codeina < 0.10.1-10 # yum update [...] Installing: pk-gstreamer-plugin-fake noarch 1.0-1 tmp2 1.4k replacing codeina.noarch 0.10.1-8.fc9 [...] Running Transaction Installing : pk-gstreamer-plugin-fake [1/2] Erasing : codeina [2/2] Installed: pk-gstreamer-plugin-fake.noarch 0:1.0-1 Replaced: codeina.noarch 0:0.10.1-8.fc9 Complete! ---- The specfile for the test package is at http://scop.fedorapeople.org/tmp2/pk-gstreamer-plugin-fake.spec -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
