On the PackageKit mailing list we're discussing dynamic groups and icons so that the full comps groups can be supported if the client wants the same menus as in anaconda. The exact methods and signals we are adding hasn't been decided yet, but we are making progress as this needs to be cross compatible with all distros and all group conventions. It's been proposed we return a absolute path for icon names, which I think is a bad idea. It does not allow the icons to be themed, and doesn't seem portable between environments. Icons should be returned as named icons rather than full paths. The icons for fedora comps groups are shipped into /usr/share/pixmaps/comps by the comps-extras package. gnome-packagekit will by default look in /usr/share/icons/$foo and also /usr/share/gnome-packagekit/icons/hicolor for named icons. I really don't want to symlink everything in /usr/share/pixmaps/comps to /usr/share/gnome-packagekit/icons in the gnome-packagekit rpm, as kpackagekit won't be able to use these icons and it seems a bodge. I don't think comps-extras should be installing into /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/categories as it's not a theme, although this would fix a lot of problems. Anyone got any ideas? Richard. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
