On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:48:22AM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote: > On 2008-10-05, 19:36 GMT, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > I don't need a rereview of this package, currently. It is > > a (rather) unusual package, and I'd prefer if reviewer > > interested in TeX/LaTeX used their time differently, > > for example ??? Nobody stepped up to review chktex, so Tibbs is doing it, and I begun reviewing lcdf-typetools after some weeks because nobody else did it, although this is now more or less a required component of texlive. I also review ttf2pt1 although I left 2 weeks to pass hoping for somebody else to step in. And some time ago I posted all the packages that are in texlive but have a separate upstream, and it is only now that they are posted for review (chktex, ttf2pt1 and lcdf-typetools), by people needing sponsors. I may be wrong, maybe the TeX/LaTeX community in fedora is healthy, but this is not my impression. Another thing that, in my opinion, shows that we are not really very active is the lack of guidelines for TeX. It is also linked with the rapid pace of changes linked with switching to texlive 2007 and now 2008 is already there and completly different, but I don't think this is the only reason. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
