On Sunday 05 October 2008 12:49:46 pm Paul wrote: > Hi, > > I've been told from Novell that Mono rc4 (currently in rawhide) will be > released as the real 2.0 version tomorrow (Monday). > > As there is no difference between RC4 and the release version, I'm not > intending to repackage them just for the sake of it as it seems an > exercise in futility to be honest. What if the release version ends up being RC5? Isn't that the point of release candidates? > My plan is to roll out the full mono 2.0 stack to F9 as soon as F10 is > released. This will mean that for the first time, both the current and > previous versions of Fedora will be running on the same version of mono. > What will then happen is this Sounds good so far. > Mono releases version 2.1, rawhide gets this plus any bug fixes. After a > month, this is rolled down to release and after 2 months, release - 1. > This will also apply to Monodevelop. As I don't have control over other > Mono packages (or mono-based packages), can I ask that if you do have a > mono package that you also adopt this system. Currently things in F8 and > F9 are a mess and they need a good clean up. Why wait a month between F10 and F9? I can see waiting between pushing to updates-testing or rawhide and then to a stable release, but this just seems an artificial delay in pushing the latest and greatest, as well as bugfixes. > TTFN > > Paul Regards, -- Conrad Meyer <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
