Re: rawhide report: 20081004 changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alex Lancaster wrote:
[...]

Trying to do a quick audit/triage of the remaining broken deps (some
of which have lingered for >2 months!  (I will also repeat my request
to move the "broken deps" section to the top of the rawhide report so
that it gets more regular attention from all developers).
I think it would simplify the report if each package was mentioned just once, with a leader or trailer stating the arch(s) that it failed on. This assists to quickly determine if the issue is likely to be arch specific, or cross platform. What do you think ?

DaveT.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux