When I build the new version of PackageKit today, it will have a new subpackage, PackageKit-gstreamer-plugin. This provides the optional binary /usr/libexec/pk-gstreamer-install which is symlinked to gst-install-plugins-helper. This means we get UI like this http://packagekit.org/img/gpk-client-codecs.png rather than being prompted to pay for codecs using codeina. Should I just add: Obsoletes: codeina < 0.10.1-8 Provides: codeina = 0.10.1-8 to the gstreamer-plugin part of the spec file and be done away with codeina? This would allow people to remove PackageKit-gstreamer-plugin and install codeina if they really wanted, but by default we get the "right" thing installed for the release. Also, we can't do an "everything" install, as both packages provide the gst-install-plugins-helper file. One option might be for the gstreamer package to install a bash script gst-install-plugins-helper, which directs to either codeina, or PackageKit. So what I'm really asking is, do we really want people to be able to: 1. use codeina in F10 2. install PackageKit-gstreamer-plugin and codeina at the same time Advice welcome. Richard. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
