Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:17:50 -0400
"Horst H. von Brand" <vonbrand@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Seems like doing an IO heavy task like this will no longer be much
of an issue with a parallel init type startup.
Parallel init is still limited by IO-heavy tasks. All I've seen about
"parallel service startup" is that is makes almost no difference.
"parallel init" is surprisingly not the answer to booting fast.
(unlike parallel, asynchronous components do help)
But there's no reason to delay logins until cron or the sendmail daemon
have started. And the sendmail daemon doesn't really ever have to run
unless there are undelivered messages in the queue. I'd guess the only
reason it was ever done that way was the convention of giving X it's own
runlevel which doesn't make all that much sense anyway.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
