Re: Do we care about /sbin /bin linked to /usr/lib ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 26 September 2008 14:43:11 Dan Nicholson wrote:

> On the rpm5 list, Jeff Johnson mentioned that /bin/rpm was just a
> legacy thing that people expected and has since changed the package to
> install to $bindir (/usr/bin). Not that that applies here exactly, but
> making /bin/rpm usable when /usr is not available would require moving
> a lot of things to /lib.

Not that big a list, but hardly worth it.

Long term, I'll admit that getting rid of separate /usr may be a good idea, 
Solaris appears to have done away with it a while ago (which surprised me, 
since they used to make explicit provision for having shared /usr in their 
package management system).

Anyway, there are quite a few situations in which you're basically screwed 
unless you can run your package manager (and possibly things like ldconfig) so 
I'd like to add another vote in favour of adding a "create a rescue image" 
command somewhere ...

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux