>>>>> "TL" == Thorsten Leemhuis writes: [...] >> and to get the highest visability to your package you should be >> entering it. TL> Sure. But if you read my mail up to the end you will notice that a TL> good bunch of packagers don't care and don't add their packages to TL> comps. I want to know if we in Fedora (the project/the TL> distribution) should work towards fixing that. That implies a TL> proper policy (which is not really clear right now), fixing the TL> current mess where round about one/third of our packages (or even TL> more; depends on the way you count) are missing in comps.xml and TL> making sure all apps present the data from comps in a similar way. Yep, this is a real problem with the comps.xml approach at the moment. See the feature request: https://fedorahosted.org/packagedb/ticket/78 and my response to another part of the thread. Alex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
