On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I belive (and I stated as much in the FESCo meeting where we talked about > this briefly), that the crux of the issue with your proposal is the "needs > to build natively" item. That is the issue FESCo needs to further consider, > along with the packaging guidelines that the MinGW SIG is drafting. I fully accept that this issue needs thought. And your right, this cross compiling stuff is different. I'm fully aware that I'm muddying the waters with analogies to 2ndary arches. But its the only comparison my pea-sized brain is capable of finding and holding on to to as a reference point as we pilot this steam boat up river into unknown waters. Toshio asked for an explanation of my thinking...i've given it. If the reasoning doesn't make sense to anyone else, continuing to ask me to re-explain my thinking is probably not going to particularly fruitful...until we find an interpreter who is fluent in Jef-speak. -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
