On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 11:38 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:55:26AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> I think I've missed something if that's actually the case. Is there > >> really a non-Sun java that is 100% compatible? When I run java apps, I > > > > IBM I believe > > > >> don't want something "interesting" to happen. > > > > Thats about the trademark name not the code. You don't care what running > > 'frobozz' does, but what 'java' means.. > > Right - but I've just seen too much stuff that pretends to be java that > isn't quite. My latest encounter is a cell phone that doesn't give the > jvm access to its soft (and only) keyboard. You can install mini-opera > but you can't type a url... This really does not apply, you are confounding JVM compliance with the sandboxing technique the phone maker decided to adopt. You can as easily have a Sun JVM running in Linux and denying it access to a keyboard. These are 2 completely orthogonal things. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
