Re: Fedora not "free" enough for GNU?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 08:58 -0400, jude ui wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/17/08, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
>         jude ui wrote:
>         
>                    Might want to take a look at
>                 
>                 
>                  http://doolittle.icarus.com/~larry/fwinventory/2.6.17.html
>                 
>                    Rahul
>                 
>                 
>                    Why is there the source for firmware?
>         
>         >Sorry. I am not sure what that means.
>         
>         Rahul
>         
>         Thanks for the link - but it's debian-I thought we were
>         talking about Fedora here
>  
> And to repharse my question - Can't you guys reselse the firmware as

"release"?

>  opensource - are they prosperity drivers? (correct me if I'm wrong)

"proprietary"?

If I understand you correctly(*), then yes, most (all?) firmware is
proprietary software for which we don't have the source code.

(*): It's a bit hard to answer questions where you have to guess what is
asked ;-).

Nils
-- 
Nils Philippsen      "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase 
Red Hat               a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty
nils@xxxxxxxxxx       nor Safety."  --  Benjamin Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint:      C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux