Re: system autodeath

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Glen Turner <gdt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am the author of the Wiki page with the suggestion. A friend showed
> me this discussion and I'd like to add a few points.

I was in charge of computer labs around here, and have known my measure of
users... even ones you'd think should be /very/ sophisticated.

- What makes you think that when the machine gets disabled, a Google search
  won't suggest that the "easiest solution" is just disabling autodeath? 
- Nagging the user at the screen of the machine is of no use, they mostly
  don't care about upgrading (and if they do, can't do anything about
  it). The lab administrator is probably running something else in any
  case.
- Many times around here upgrades were held back because something or other
  didn't work (old servers + new clients: No autofs and thus no accounts;
  GCC update: Examples/asignments don't compile anymore; random package
  upgrade: Some propietary extension or program doesn't work). Yes,
  sometimes it /is/ rational not to upgrade. And sadly, many times those
  can't be bugzilla'd decently.

- Yes, a /long/ time ago we had a Windows machine just for our students
  working on their theses... and it started behaving weird. One of the
  users had disabled the antivirus, as it didn't let them run a program
  from diskette, while loudly warning that it was infected...
- In the Red Hat 7.3 timeframe (our machines were kept rigurously up to
  date) a user tried an exploit targeted at _unpatched_ Red Hat 6, that had
  an /explicit/ warning that it wouldn't work on anything newer, and that
  it generated a very noticeable overload on the target, during lab rush
  hour against the machine of the neighboring user... we didn't know if we
  should punish him for attempted cracking or sheer stupidity.
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                    Fono: +56 32 2654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria             +56 32 2654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000       Fax:  +56 32 2797513

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux