Re: make force-tag gone

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday 14 September 2008 10:41:37 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > You have to bump and rebuild the Rawhide package now too.
> >
> > Actually, I just did that for you in this case. 

Why would you do this to my package? Its not like this has to be fixed this 
morning.


> > But normally, this is the maintainer's job, and doing the F-9 bumps the
> > right way, it isn't necessary.
>
> Well, the build failed, so it looks like the fixes actually need to go into
> the Rawhide package too. 

This is libgcrypt. There are probably a lot of things failing. I am working 
this with upstream to see if we can get a fix.


> Right now you have not only an upgrade path bug, but also an FTBFS bug.
> Please fix libprelude ASAP.

If we didn't go taking away something people use, this wouldn't have happened. 
There is no reason why developers can't have force-tag and rel-eng have some 
audit trail.

-Steve


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux