On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Arthur Pemberton <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Matthew Woehlke >>> <mw_triad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> No, >>>> thanks; I'd rather have X fail to start and dump me at a normal console from >>>> which I can fix the problem *without rebooting*, much less needing to dig up >>>> a rescue disk :P. >>> >>> I believe we already do that today, and am not advocating removing >>> that functionality if possible. Anyways, I've said what I need to, so >>> hopefully people won't be surprised later. >> >> >> I'm confused. Is Fedora really going to remove non X consoles? > > I'm talking about the direction and technology of the desktop product; > what server images, embedded etc. do is an entirely different matter. What is the proper procedure for adding input to this decision? -- Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
