Karel Zak wrote: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:48:57PM -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: >> On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 17:40 +0100, Bill Crawford wrote: >>> If you have multi-channel hardware that mixes itself, then using >>> PulseAudio sort of defeats the purpose of that hardware ;o) >> You're absolutely right... if all you're using PulseAudio for is basic >> mixing. But as soon as you need/want something like per-app volume >> control, network transport, audio stream redirection, or audio device >> hotplugging then you want PulseAudio. > > How many **ordinary** Fedora users really need these **advanced** > features? > > For example I have never had any serious SW problem with sound on > Linux. And I use it for more than 10 years... > Quite a few need network transport when you talk about thinclient. It's made worse by the fact that in many of those situations you have a whole bunch of extremely ordinary Fedora users to a small number of entry-level-knowledge admins. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
