On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 11:06 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > ... we really shouldn't shove in major changes like this for a > significant chunk of hardware post-beta. Putting it in the beta means > that we get a relatively large chunk of testing done due to the > visibility surrounding the beta announce. As well as having time to fix > large problems that are uncovered. Later milestones both a) lack the > time for changes after them and b) the visibility. Yeah, I'm not so keen on doing all of this post-beta. We've got enough stability problems with F10 as it is. This honestly feels like one of those features that just isn't 'testable' by Beta, and thus needs to enact the contingency plan. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/KernelModesetting#Contingency_Plan How do things look for that contingency plan. Is it even possible at this point? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
