Re: modesetting feature status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 11:28 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Dave Airlie wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > So one of the features we've been trying to land for F10 that is a major
> > change in how we deal with graphics hardware in the Linux world. 
> > 
> 
> <snip>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I own both an r200, r300 and r500 based card. Sofar I've refrained from filing 
> any modesettings related bugs, as the code is moving so fast that my bug would 
> be obsolete the next day. Would now be a good time to start filing bugs about 
> any issues I encounter? If not, when do you expect the code to be in a state 
> where you want to know about any regressions compared to F-9?

I'm 100% interested in the output doesn't light up kinda bugs.

If anyone encounters these what would be useful is to over ssh

boot with nomodeset 3 - go to no X runlevel.
rmmod radeon drm
modprobe drm debug=1
modprobe radeon modeset=1

and attach dmesg to a bug, also add an xorg log from a nomodeset boot

Next on the list are oops and crashes.

If I can solve the crashers and modeset not starting I can start on the
artifacts, rendering speed regressions and 3D bits.

but from the beta release I'd feel free to file any bugs against it.

Dave.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux