Re: make force-tag gone

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 17:10 -0700, Conrad Meyer wrote:
> Quoth Nicolas Mailhot:
> > Le mercredi 10 septembre 2008 à 18:03 -0400, Dave Jones a écrit :
> > 
> > > Now, I could bump the specfile and add "disable option foo on ppc" but if 
> I did
> > > this, our changelogs would be absolutely enormous, and for very little 
> gain.
> > 
> > No one is asking you to add a new changelog line every time you make a
> > small change. You can bump the version in the changelog at the same time
> > you bump it elsewhere
> > 
> > -- 
> > Nicolas Mailhot
> 
> Actually, they are.
> 
> See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs
No, you're misreading this. If a package with some n-v-r was never built
it doesn't make any sense to have a special changelog entry for it. The
wiki is talking about small changes in already built packages. Only once
the package has been built and you do even a trivial change (or even no
change at all except bumping release because for example the dependecies
changed) and do rebuild, then you must add a changelog entry.

-- 
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
                                              Turkish proverb

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux