On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 08:22:33AM -0600, orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > libnc-dap (shouldn't need work, right?): > grads/grads.spec:BuildRequires: libnc-dap-devel > ncl/ncl.spec:BuildRequires: g2clib-devel, libnc-dap-devel, librx-devel, > atlas-devel > nco/nco.spec:BuildRequires: netcdf-devel, libnc-dap-devel > octave-forge/octave-forge.spec:BuildRequires: ImageMagick-c++-devel > libnc-dap-devel pcre-devel gsl-devel > > > Seems pretty small, and you already seem to maintain many (most) of them. > How hard would it be to port to the new libdap and just skip the compat > package? I've CC'ed Balint who maintains gdal. I maintain ncl. I have kicked a build of libdap and dependent packages. Packages linked against libnc-dap will also need a rebuild, since they spuriously depend on libdap. With the new nc-dap-config using pkgconfig, this should be the last time, though. In # repoquery --whatrequires libdap.so.8 there are, among others: grads-0:1.9b4-23.fc9.i386 octave-forge-0:20080429-6.fc10.i386 ncl-0:5.0.0-11.fc9.i386 nco-0:3.9.5-1.fc10.i386 So they need to be rebuilt, but there is no reason why they should fail. I'll rebuild them if they are not rebuilt shortly after the new libnc-dap lands in the repository. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
