Re: make force-tag gone

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 05:39:48PM +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jeffrey Ollie <jeff <at> ocjtech.us> writes:
> > Refusing to bump a release number and re-tag because you don't want to
> > "look stupid" is not a technical argument.
> 
> Maybe, but it's a practical argument.
> 
> > And before you ask, yes I've used force-tag before even though I know
> > I shouldn't.  Removing it will help me be a better package manager.
> 
> No, it will make you a worse packager, as your Release tags will get 
> incremented for no reason.

It is far far worse than this. If you made a mistake doing an update
for Fedora 8, and have to bump the Release tag, its quite possible
F8 will end up with newer N-E-V-R, than your F9 & rawhide builds
breaking the upgrade path. So, now you have to re-build F9 and rawhide
with pointless Release tag bumps too :-(

Daniel
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux