On Tuesday 09 September 2008 05:14:00 am Bastien Nocera wrote: > I'm pretty sure it was discussed before, and I forcefully ignored it > thinking people would realise it was a bad idea to drop it. > > It's just that it's making us look like idiots in the changelogs, having > to bump release for something like that: > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/gvfs/devel/gvfs.spec?r1=1.69&r2=1. >70 to ensure GPL compliance and that we can always reproduce we have said for awhile now that tags will eventually be made immutable I had missed that Mike Bonnet had added it, if it had been caught it would have been removed sooner. I would love someone to help here. adding checks to makefile.common check that all patches are commited and that source is updated and commited. AFAIK these are the most common reasons people force a tag and the closest thing to a valid reason for forcing a tag. when we tag we should be sure that the build is fine and going to build. thats why we have targets like mockbuild other targets to help test things are always welcome. Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
