Re: Merge review question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 07:33:37AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> If the owner of a former Core package is unresponsive to activity on a
> Merge Review bug, despite being CCd, and the changes needed are minor, and
> the reviewer is an uberpackager, is there any reason not to simply commit
> the changes to cvs with comments and close the bug?

For the sake of not surprising the maintainer, I'd recommend just sending 
them a direct email indicating your intentions and then doing the changes.
People here at Red Hat get a tonne of email spam from BugZilla so it is 
trivial to miss things if it is 1 message in a 100 you get from BZ in a
day. So the non-BZ email is more likely to be noticed & avoid the maintainer
being surprised at the changes :-)

Daniel
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux