Re: Merge review question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Tuesday, 09 September 2008 at 14:33, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> If the owner of a former Core package is unresponsive to activity on a
>> Merge Review bug, despite being CCd, and the changes needed are minor,
>> and
>> the reviewer is an uberpackager, is there any reason not to simply
>> commit
>> the changes to cvs with comments and close the bug?
>
> Or begin AWOL maintainer procedure?

Many are clearly not AWOL.  Some of these packages have had a build or two
since my last comments.  Some owners are RH employees.

In these cases, I've re-reviewed the current build, noted differences, and
double-checked ownership and CC status on the bug.


> Regards,
> R.
>
> --
> Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
> Livna http://rpm.livna.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
> "Faith manages."
>         -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>


-- 
novus ordo absurdum

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux