Bastien Nocera <bnocera <at> redhat.com> writes: > I'm pretty sure it was discussed before, and I forcefully ignored it > thinking people would realise it was a bad idea to drop it. They'd probably have ignored you even if you had complained, I did and I was ignored. :-/ > It's just that it's making us look like idiots in the changelogs, having > to bump release for something like that: > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/gvfs/devel/gvfs.spec?r1=1.69&r2=1.70 +1 Please put it back! At least until we have a workable alternative. I don't call having to bump Release for each trivial build fix "workable". Otherwise, I think we'll end up with lots of packages with the kernel's "make Release from CVS revision" hack, is that really what we want??? Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
