Chris Evich wrote: > Hi, > > Hopefully this is the right mailing list :) > > Project rpmbuilder aims to provide a template-based approach to packaging. In > other words, it removes responsibility from developer to produce an RPM spec > file the "right" way. Instead, the package developer just feeds in his > project's particulars, and a template-driven engine puts the pieces together > and spits out a "sane" RPM and SRPM. > > https://fedorahosted.org/rpmbuilder Interesting. Fails to build here: gcc -D__USE_FIXED_PROTOTYPES__ -Wall -g -pthread -DORBIT2=1 -I/home/behdad/.local/include/cairo -I/home/behdad/.local/include/pango-1.0 -I/home/behdad/.local/include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libgnome-2.0 -I/usr/include/libbonobo-2.0 -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnomeui-2.0 -I/usr/include/libbonoboui-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnomecanvas-2.0 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libart-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/include/libglade-2.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -c -o template.o template.c In file included from template.c:32: macro.h:39: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘macro_new_context’ macro.h:42: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘mc’ macro.h:47: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘mc’ macro.h:52: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘mc’ template.c: In function ‘template_expand’: template.c:41: error: ‘MacroContext’ undeclared (first use in this function) template.c:41: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once template.c:41: error: for each function it appears in.) template.c:41: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘mc’ template.c:49: error: ‘mc’ undeclared (first use in this function) template.c:49: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘macro_new_context’ make: *** [template.o] Error 1 > Given the recent discussions on dependency management, perhaps there is some > interest in helping me develop this tool further. There's no mailing list > yet, so if interested, please contact me directly. Thanks! > > cevich [at-sign] redhat [dot] com > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
